Publications

PEER REVIEWED PAPERS IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS

  1. A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, A Mackenzie et al.  The effect of system geometry and dose on the threhold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys Med Biol 62 (2017) 858-877. 
  2. L Cockmartin, N W Marshall, G Zhang et al.  Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Phys Med Biol 62 758-780.
  3. A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis et al  Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.  European Radiology 2016; 26:874-83 doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3885-y.
  4. E Fredenberg, F Kilburn-Toppin, DR Dance et al  Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: solid lesions.  Phys. Med. Biol. 61 (2016) 2595-2612. (doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/7/2595)
  5. KC Young  Commentary on: A Comparison of two digital mammography systems: are there any differences?  Clinical Radiology 2016;71:25-6. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.003.
  6. H Petersson, LM Warren, A Tingberg et al.  Validation of a simulation procedure for generating breast tomosynthesis projection images. Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2016) (doi:10.1093/rpd/ncv555).
  7. A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis et al. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics (published online) doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.004
  8. RW Bouwman, J Binst, DR Dance et al.  Simulating local dense areas using PMMA to assess automatic exposure contol in digital mammography.  Radiation Protection dosimetry. 2016 Mar 13:ncw032. (doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw032)
  9. K Erhard, F Kilburn-Toppin, P Willsher et al. Characterization of Cystic Lesions by Spectral Mammography: Results of a Clinical Pilot Study. Invest Radiol. 2016 May;51(5):340-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000246.
  10. KC Young, JM Oduko.  Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.  Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150831. doi:10.1259/bjr.20150831.
  11. FJ Gilbert, L Tucker, KC Young. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Clin Radiol 2016;71:141-50. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2015.11.008.
  12. A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis, et al. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Physica Medica 2016;32:568-74. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.004.
  13. R W Bouwman, R E van Engen, M J M Broeders et al. Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography.Physica Medica 32 (2016) 1559-1569.
  14. L M Warren, D R Dance and K C Young. Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography.  Brit J Radiol (2016): doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150897.
  15. D R Dance and I Sechopoulos  Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging (invited topical review).  Phys Med Biol 61 (2016) R271-304
  16. F Gilbert, L Tucker, M Gillan et al  A comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY (TOMMY Trial) in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme Radiology (2015 accepted)
  17. R W Bouwman, O Diaz, R E van Engen et al Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015) N1-7 (doi:10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/N1. Epub 2014 Dec 1)
  18. P Looney, M D Halling-Brown, J M Oduko, K C Young  A pilot study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme  1-8 Journal of Digital Imaging, 2015 (Published online 13th January 2015)
  19. L Cockmartin, N W Marshall, C Van Ongeval et al  Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test  Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015) 3939-58
  20. R W Bouwman, R E van Engen, K C Young et al  Average mean glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data  Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015) 
  21. FJ Gilbert, L Tucker, MGC Gillan et al  Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for depicting breast cancer subgroups in a UK retrospective reading study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology 2015; 277: 697-706
  22. A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis et al. Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detector.  European Radiology (DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3885-y) (June 2015)
  23. PT Looney, KC Young, MD Halling-Brown. Medxviewer: providing a web-enabled workstation environment for collaborative and remote medical imaging viewing; perception studies and reader training. Radiation Protection Dosimetry (DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv482) (2015)
  24. CJ Strudley, KC Young, P Looney, FJ Gilbert. Development and experience of quality control methods for digital breast tomosynthesis systems. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150324. doi:10.1259/bjr.20150324.  
  25. Mackenzie A, Dance DR, Diaz O, Young KC. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities. (submitted to Medical Physics)
  26. Bouwman RW, Diaz O, van Engen RE, Young KC, Veldkamp WJH, Dance DR. Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts. Phys. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) submitted
  27. Shaheen E, De Keyzer F, Bosmans H, Dance DR, Young KC, Ongeval CV. The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Phys. 41 (2014) (published online Aug. 2014)
  28. Warren LM, Cooke J, Given-Wilson RM, Wallis MG, Halling-Brown M, Chakraborty DP, Dance DR, Bosmans H, Young KC. The effect of image processing on detection of cancers in digital mammography. J. Radiol. 203 (2014) 387-393.
  29. Diaz O, Dance DR, Young KC, Elangovan P, Bakic PR and Wells K. Estimation of scattered radiation in digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) 4375–4390.
  30. Dance DR, Young KC. Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) 2127-37.
  31. Elangovan P, Warren LM, Mackenzie A, Diaz O, Rashidnasab A, Dance DR, Bosmans H, Young KC, K Wells. Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis images. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) 4275–4293.
  32. Fredenberg E, Dance DR, Willsher P, Moa E, von Tiedemann M, Young KC, Wallis MG. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: first results on cyst fluid. Med. Biol. 58 (2013) 8609-8620.

 

PAPERS IN CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS

  1. J M Oduko, K C Young Patient Dose Survey of Mammography Systems in the UK in 2013-2015  IWDM 2016. LNCS 9699, pp. 1-8, (2016)2016
  2. D Petrov, K Michielsen, L Cockmartin et al.  Development and application of a channelized Hotelling observer for DBT optimization on structured background test images with mass simulating targets.In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 24 (pp. 97871K-97871K). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  3. MN Patel, KC Young, MD Halling-Brown. Collection of sequential imaging events for research in breast cancer screening. In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 25 (pp. 97890K-97890K). International Society for Optics and Photonics. 
  4. LM Warren, MD Halling-Brown, PT Looney et al.  Impact of two types of image processing on cancer detection in mammography.  In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 24 (pp. 978704-978704). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  5. P Elangovan, F Alrehily, RF Pinto et al. Simulation of spiculated breast lesions.  In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 22 (pp. 97832E-97832E). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
  6. P Elangovan, DR Dance, KC Young, K Wells.  Generation of 3D synthetic breast tissue.  In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 22 (pp. 978308-978308). International Society for Optics and Photonics. 
  7. A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, PT Looney et al.  Detection of microcalcification clusters by 2D-mammography and narrow and wide angle digital breast tomosynthesis. In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 22 (pp. 978306-978306). International Society for Optics and Photonics. 
  8. A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, PT Looney et al. Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in 2D-Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Relation to the Standard Method of Measuring Image Quality.  January 2016 . XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016 . 01/2016: pages 217-221; . ISBN: 978-3-319-32701-3.
  9. A Mackenzie, A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan et al. Effect of Dose on the Detection of Micro-Calcification Clusters for Planar and Tomosynthesis Imaging.   IWDM 2016 2016;LNCS 9699:152-9. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_20.
  10. P Elangovan, A Hadjipanteli, A Mackenzie et al.  OPTIMAM Image Simulation Toolbox - Recent Developments and Ongoing Studies.  IWDM 2016 2016;9699:668-75. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_83. 
  11. A Mackenzie, KC Young, S Creten et al.  Improving the Quality of Optimisation Studies Undertaken in Mammography and General Radiology Using High Level Blended Teaching.  Springer International Publishing; 2016, p. 75-82. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_10. 
  12. P Looney, L M Warren, D R Dance, K C Young  Sampling probability distributions of lesions in mammograms Proc. SPIE 9418, Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations, 94180R-94180R-8 (March 17, 2015)'
  13. M N Patel, P T Looney, K C Young, M D Halling-Brown  Quantitative imaging features: extension of the oncology medical image database  Proc. SPIE 9418, Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations, 941812 (March 17, 2015)'
  14. P Elangovan, A Rashidnasab, A Mackenzie et al  Performance comparison of breast imaging modalities using a 4AFC human observer study  Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 94121T (March 18, 2015)
  15. A Rashidnasab, P Elangovan, A Mackenzie, D R Dance et al  Virtual clincal trials using inserted pathology in clinical images: investigation of assumptions for local glandularity and noise  Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 94122D-94122D-7 (March 18, 2015)'
  16. E Fredenberg, K Erhard, K Berggren et al  X-ray attenuation of adipose breast tissue: in-vitro and in-vivo measurements using spectral imaging  Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 94121U (March 18, 2015)
  17. J M Oduko, P Homolka, V Jones, D Whitwam  Dose and image quality measurements for contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography systems Proc. of SPIE, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical ImaginVol.9412, 94125I-1
  18. Warren LM, Dummott L, Wallis MG , Given-Wilson RM, Cooke J, Dance DR Young KC. Characterisation of Screen Detected and Simulated Calcification Clusters in Digital Mammograms. In Breast Imaging, 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, H. Fujita, T. Hara, and C. Muramatsu (Eds.):, LNCS 8539, pp. 364–371, 2014 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).
  19. Looney PT, Warren LM, Astley SM, Young KC. Comparison of Calcification Cluster Detection by CAD and Human Observers at Different Image Quality Levels. In Breast Imaging, 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, H. Fujita, T. Hara, and C. Muramatsu (Eds.): LNCS 8539, pp. 643–649, 2014 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).
  20. MD Halling-Brown, PT. Looney, MN Patel, LM Warren, A. Mackenzie, KC Young. Mammographic Image Database (MIDB) and Associated Web-Enabled Software for Research. In Breast Imaging, 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, H. Fujita, T. Hara, and C. Muramatsu (Eds.): LNCS 8539, pp. 514–519, 2014 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).
  21. Halling-Brown MD, Patel M, Looney P, Young K. Research database of oncology medical images. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 9 (2014) Supplement 1, S78-79.
  22. Patel M, Burnett J, Looney P, Young K, Halling-Brown M. Automated collection of medical images for research. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 9 (2014) Supplement 1, S268-69.
  23. PT Looney, KC Young, A Mackenzie, MD Halling-Brown. MedXViewer: an extensible web-enabled software package for medical imaging, Proc. SPIE 9037, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 90371K (March 11, 2014)