{"id":231,"date":"2025-04-14T12:57:58","date_gmt":"2025-04-14T12:57:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/10.161.128.46\/zkhan\/nccpm\/?page_id=231"},"modified":"2025-05-13T13:51:50","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T13:51:50","slug":"publications","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/home\/publications\/","title":{"rendered":"Publications"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-left: 40px; margin-right: 20px\">\n\n\n<div style=\"display: flex; justify-content: center; margin-top: 20px;\"><form method=\"post\" style=\"margin-bottom:20px; text-align: center;\"><input type=\"text\" name=\"pub_search\" placeholder=\"Search publications\u2026\" value=\"\" \/><select name=\"pub_type\"><option value=\"\">All Types<\/option><option value=\"Abstracts\">Abstracts<\/option><option value=\"Book Reports\">Book Reports<\/option><option value=\"Conference Proceedings\">Conference Proceedings<\/option><option value=\"Papers\">Papers<\/option><option value=\"Technical Evaluations\">Technical Evaluations<\/option><\/select><select name=\"pub_year\"><option value=\"\">All Years<\/option><option value=\"2024\">2024<\/option><option value=\"2023\">2023<\/option><option value=\"2022\">2022<\/option><option value=\"2021\">2021<\/option><option value=\"2020\">2020<\/option><option value=\"2019\">2019<\/option><option value=\"2018\">2018<\/option><option value=\"2017\">2017<\/option><option value=\"2016\">2016<\/option><option value=\"2015\">2015<\/option><option value=\"2014\">2014<\/option><option value=\"2013\">2013<\/option><option value=\"2012\">2012<\/option><option value=\"2011\">2011<\/option><option value=\"2010\">2010<\/option><option value=\"2009\">2009<\/option><option value=\"2008\">2008<\/option><option value=\"2007\">2007<\/option><option value=\"2006\">2006<\/option><option value=\"2005\">2005<\/option><option value=\"2004\">2004<\/option><option value=\"2003\">2003<\/option><option value=\"2002\">2002<\/option><option value=\"2001\">2001<\/option><option value=\"2000\">2000<\/option><option value=\"1999\">1999<\/option><option value=\"1998\">1998<\/option><option value=\"1997\">1997<\/option><option value=\"1996\">1996<\/option><option value=\"1995\">1995<\/option><option value=\"1994\">1994<\/option><option value=\"1993\">1993<\/option><option value=\"1992\">1992<\/option><option value=\"\" selected='selected'><\/option><\/select><button type=\"submit\">Filter<\/button><\/form><\/div><div class=\"publications-list\"><h4><u>Papers in Scientific Journals<\/u><\/h4><ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding: 0;\"><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>S Squires, EF Harkness, A Mackenzie A, et al Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality.\u00a0\u00a0Biomed Phys Eng Express 10:045021\n\u00a0 <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/2057-1976\/ad470b\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>S Squires, A Mackenzie, DG Evans, et al\u00a0 Capability and reliability of deep learning models to make density predictions on low-dose mammograms.\u00a0\u00a0Journal of Medical Imaging Volume 11, Issue 4, 044506 (August 2024)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/journals\/journal-of-medical-imaging\/volume-11\/issue-4\/044506\/Capability-and-reliability-of-deep-learning-models-to-make-density\/10.1117\/1.JMI.11.4.044506.short#_=_\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>W Hamad, MJ Michell, JP Myles et al.\u00a0Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis plus synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography with or without tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis\u00a0\u00a0International Journal of Cancer.\u00a02024;\u00a01-11. doi:10.1002\/ijc.35217\n\u00a0 <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijc.35217\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Loveland, A Mackenzie\u00a0 Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programmes 2019-2023. British Journal of Radiology 97:787\u2013793.\u00a0\n\u00a0 <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/bjr\/article-abstract\/97\/1156\/787\/7593807?redirectedFrom=fulltext\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, E Lewis, J Loveland\u00a0 Successes and challenges in extracting information from DICOM image databases for audit and research\u00a0 The British Institute of Radiology Vol. 96 No. 1151<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20230104\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2023<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D Cushnan, K C Young, D Ward et al Lessons learned from independent external validation of an AI tool to detect breast cancer using a representative UK dataset\u00a0 The British Institute of Radiology 10.1259\/bjr.20211104 <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1259\/bjr.20211104\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2023<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Loveland, K C Young, J M Oduko et al\u00a0 Radiation Doses in the United Kingdom breast screening programmes 2016-2019\u00a0 The British Journal of Radiology May 2022 bjr.20211400<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20211400\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2022<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M Stuffins, J Loveland, M Halling-Brown, A Mackenzie\u00a0\u00a0The relationship between age of digital mammography systems and number of reported faults and downtime\u00a0\u00a0Physica Medica 98, 113-121 <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S1120179722019718\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2022<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, J Boita, DR Dance, KC Young\u00a0\u00a0Development of an algorithm to convert mammographic images to appear as if acquired with different technique factors\u00a0\u00a0Journal of Medical Imaging 9 (3), 033504\n\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/journals\/journal-of-medical-imaging\/volume-9\/issue-3\/033504\/Development-of-an-algorithm-to-convert-mammographic-images-to-appear\/10.1117\/1.JMI.9.3.033504.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2022<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, S Kaur, E L Thomson, M Mitchell et al\u00a0 Effect of glandularity on the detection of simulated cancers in planar, tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging of the breast using a hybrid virtual clinical trial Medical Physics Online\u00a0https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/mp.15216\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/full\/10.1002\/mp.15216\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A J Abdi, B Mussmann, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D\/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems Diagnostics 2021, Vol. 11, Page 1932 11 1932 Online: https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/11\/10\/1932\/htm <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/11\/10\/1932\/htm\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A J Abdi, B R Mussmann, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Quantitative Image Quality Metrics of the Low-Dose 2D\/3D Slot Scanner Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems Diagnostics 2021, Vol. 11, Page 1699 11 1699 Online: https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/11\/9\/1699\/htm <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mdpi.com\/2075-4418\/11\/9\/1699\/htm\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, E L Thomson, M Mitchell et al\u00a0 Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging European Radiology 2021 1\u20139\u00a0https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-021-08197-x\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-021-08197-x\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, R E van Engen, A Mackenzie et al How does image quality affect radiologists&#039; perceived ability for image interpretation and lesion detection in digital mammography?\u00a0 European Radiology\u00a031:5335-5343. <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-020-07679-8\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E S Burnside, L M Warren, J Myles et al\u00a0 Quantitative breast density analysis to predict interval and node-positive cancers in pursuit of improved screening protocols: a case-control study\u00a0\u00a0British Journal of Cancer; https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41416-021-01466-y<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41416-021-01466-y\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, A Mackenzie,\u00a0R E van Engen et al Validation of a mammographic image quality modification algorithm using 3D-printed breast phantoms\u00a0 Journal of Medical Imaging, 8(3), 033502 (2021)<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/journals\/journal-of-medical-imaging\/volume-8\/issue-3\/033502\/Validation-of-a-mammographic-image-quality-modification-algorithm-using-3D\/10.1117\/1.JMI.8.3.033502.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, R E van Engen, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Validation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography using ROC analysis\u00a0\u00a0European Journal of Radiology 139:109686\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0720048X21001662\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, A Bolejko, S Zackrisson et al\u00a0 Development and content validity evaluation of a candidate instrument to assess image quality in digital mammography: A mixed-method study\u00a0 European Journal of Radiology 134: 109464<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0720048X20306549\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2021<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M D Halling-Brown, L M Warren, D Ward et al. OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database: A large-scale resource of mammography images and clinical data. Radiology AI 3:e200103\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/pubs.rsna.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1148\/ryai.2020200103\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>S M McKinney, M Sieniek, V Godbole et al.\u00a0 International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577, 89\u201394 (2020)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-019-1799-6\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D Petrov, N Marshall, KC Young et al\u00a0 Model and human observer reproducibility for detection of microcalcification clusters in digital breast tomosynthesis images of three-dimensionally structured test object\u00a0 Journal of Medical Imaging 6 (1), 015503\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/journals\/Journal-of-Medical-Imaging\/volume-6\/issue-1\/015503\/Model-and-human-observer-reproducibility-for-detection-of-microcalcification-clusters\/10.1117\/1.JMI.6.1.015503.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>O Diaz, P Elangovan, KC Young et al\u00a0 Simple method for computing scattered radiation in breast tomosynthesis\u00a0 Medical Physics, Volume 46, Issue 11 p: 4826 - 4836\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/abs\/10.1002\/mp.13760\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A J Abdi, B Mussman, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Comparison of radiation exposure to the patient and contrast detail resolutions across low dose 2D\/3D slot scanner and two conventional digital radiography X-ray imaging systems\u00a0 Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/advance-article-abstract\/doi\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncz006\/5365750\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D Petrov, N W Marshall, K C Young, H Bosmans\u00a0 Systematic approach to channelized Hotelling model observer implementation for a physical phantom containing mass-like lesions: Application to digital breast tomosynthesis\u00a0 Physica Medica 58, 8 - 20\u00a0\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1120179718313735\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 The threshold detectable mass diameter for 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis\u00a0 Physica Medica 57, 25 - 32\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1120179718313309\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Mackenzie, DR Dance et al\u00a0 Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observers\u00a0 Physics in Medicine and Biology 63 (9), 095014\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/aabd53\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>S W Duffy, O W E Morrish, P C Allgood et al\u00a0 Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer\u00a0 European Journal of Cancer 88, 48 - 56, January 2018\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S095980491731362X\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C J Strudley, K C Young, L M Warren Mammography cancer detection: comparison of single 8MP and pair of 5MP reporting monitors The British Journal of Radiology 91 (1090), 20170246 \n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1259\/bjr.20170246\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Fredenberg, P Willsher, E Moa et al\u00a0 Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral imaging: fresh and fixed normal and malignant tissue Physics in Medicine and Biology 63 (23), 235003\n<\/em> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Mackenzie, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Design and Validation of Realistic Breast Models for Use in Multiple Alternative Forced Choice Virtual Clinical Trials\u00a0 Phys. Med. Biol. 62:2778-2794, 2017\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa622c\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, A Mackenzie, RE van Engen et al. Towards image quality assessment in mammography using model observer: detection of calcification like objects. Medical Physics 2017 Vol 44, p5726-39. <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/mp.12532\/full\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, TD Eales, HL Dunn et al. Simulation of images of CDMAM phantom and the estimation of measurement uncertainties of threshold gold thickness. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics 39:137-146, 2017\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1120179717302090\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, NW Marshall, A Hadjipanteli et al. Characterisation of noise and sharpness of images from four digital breast tomosynthesis systems for simulation of images for virtual clinical trials.\u00a0 Phys. Med. Biol. 62:2376-2397,2017\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa5dd9\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Sarno, DR Dance, RE van Engen et al.\u00a0 A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.\u00a0 Medical Physics 44:3848-3860, 2017.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.1002\/mp.12339\/full\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>LM Warren, M Halling-Brown, PT Looney et al. Image processing can cause some malignant soft tissue lesions to be missed in digital mammography images\u00a0 Clinical Radiology 72:799.e1-799.e8, 2017\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0009926017301332\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L Cockmartin, NW Marshall, G Zhang et al.\u00a0 Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography. Phys Med Biol 62 758-780.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa5407\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, A Mackenzie et al.\u00a0 The effect of system geometry and dose on the threhold detectable calcification diameter in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys Med Biol 62 (2017) 858-877.  <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/aa4f6e\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, M Goffi, RE van Engen et al. Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography?\u00a0 Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics 32:1559-1569, 2017\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1120179716310857\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>H Petersson, LM Warren, A Tingberg et al.\u00a0 Validation of a simulation procedure for generating breast tomosynthesis projection images. Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2016) (doi:10.1093\/rpd\/ncv555).\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article-abstract\/169\/1-4\/386\/2375347\/VALIDATION-OF-A-SIMULATION-PROCEDURE-FOR?redirectedFrom=fulltext\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis et al. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics (published online) doi: 10.1016\/j.ejmp.2016.03.004\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.physicamedica.com\/article\/S1120-1797(16)00528-7\/abstract\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>RW Bouwman, J Binst, DR Dance et al.\u00a0 Simulating local dense areas using PMMA to assess automatic exposure contol in digital mammography.\u00a0 Radiation Protection dosimetry. 2016 Mar 13:ncw032. (doi: 10.1093\/rpd\/ncw032)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article\/169\/1-4\/143\/2375371\/SIMULATING-LOCAL-DENSE-AREAS-USING-PMMA-TO-ASSESS\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>K Erhard, F Kilburn-Toppin, P Willsher et al. Characterization of Cystic Lesions by Spectral Mammography: Results of a Clinical Pilot Study. Invest Radiol. 2016 May;51(5):340-7. doi: 10.1097\/RLI.0000000000000246.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/journals.lww.com\/investigativeradiology\/Abstract\/2016\/05000\/Characterization_of_Cystic_Lesions_by_Spectral.9.aspx\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>KC Young, JM Oduko.\u00a0 Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.\u00a0 Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150831. doi:10.1259\/bjr.20150831. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1259\/bjr.20150831\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>FJ Gilbert, L Tucker, KC Young. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool. Clin Radiol 2016;71:141-50. doi:10.1016\/j.crad.2015.11.008.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0009926015004456\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis, et al. The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. Physica Medica 2016;32:568-74. doi:10.1016\/j.ejmp.2016.03.004. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1120179716005287\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, M Goffi, R E van Engen et al. Can the channelized Hotelling observer including aspects of the human visual system predict human observer performance in mammography? Physica Medica, January 2017 Volume 33 Pages 95-105 <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.physicamedica.com\/article\/S1120-1797(16)31124-3\/abstract\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, R E van Engen, M J M Broeders et al. Can the non-pre-whitening model observer, including aspects of the human visual system, predict human observer performance in mammography. Physica Medica 32 1559-1569. <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S1120179716310857\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, D R Dance and K C Young. Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography.\u00a0 Brit J Radiol: doi: 10.1259\/bjr.20150897. <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1259\/bjr.20150897\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D R Dance and I Sechopoulos\u00a0 Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging (invited topical review).\u00a0 Phys Med Biol 61 R271-304\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/0031-9155\/61\/19\/R271\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis et al\u00a0 Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.\u00a0 European Radiology 2016; 26:874-83 doi: 10.1007\/s00330-015-3885-y.\n<\/em> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Fredenberg, F Kilburn-Toppin, DR Dance et al\u00a0 Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: solid lesions.\u00a0 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 (2016) 2595-2612. (doi: 10.1088\/0031-9155\/61\/7\/2595)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/0031-9155\/61\/7\/2595\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>KC Young\u00a0 Commentary on: A Comparison of two digital mammography systems: are there any differences?\u00a0 Clinical Radiology 2016;71:25-6. doi:10.1016\/j.crad.2015.11.003.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.clinicalradiologyonline.net\/article\/S0009-9260(15)00438-9\/abstract\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>CJ Strudley, KC Young, P Looney, FJ Gilbert. Development and experience of quality control methods for digital breast tomosynthesis systems. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150324. doi:10.1259\/bjr.20150324. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1259\/bjr.20150324\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>PT Looney, KC Young, MD Halling-Brown. Medxviewer: providing a web-enabled workstation environment for collaborative and remote medical imaging viewing; perception studies and reader training.\u00a0 Radiation Protection Dosimetry (DOI: 10.1093\/rpd\/ncv482) (2015)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/rpd\/article\/169\/1-4\/32\/2375291\/MEDXVIEWER-PROVIDING-A-WEB-ENABLED-WORKSTATION\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, LM Warren, MG Wallis et al. Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detector.\u00a0 European Radiology (DOI: 10.1007\/s00330-015-3885-y) (June 2015)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-015-3885-y\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>FJ Gilbert, L Tucker, MGC Gillan et al\u00a0 Accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for depicting breast cancer subgroups in a UK retrospective reading study (TOMMY Trial). Radiology 2015; 277: 697-706\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/pubs.rsna.org\/doi\/abs\/10.1148\/radiol.2015142566\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>F Gilbert, L Tucker, M Gillan et al\u00a0 A comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY (TOMMY Trial) in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme Radiology (accepted)\n<\/em> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, O Diaz, R E van Engen et al Dose assessment in contrast enhanced digital mammography using simple phantoms simulating standard model breasts Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015) N1-7 (doi:10.1088\/0031-9155\/60\/1\/N1. Epub 2014 Dec 1)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/60\/1\/N1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Looney, M D Halling-Brown, J M Oduko, K C Young\u00a0 A pilot study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme\u00a0 1-8 Journal of Digital Imaging, 2015 (Published online 13th January 2015)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10278-014-9759-z#page-1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L Cockmartin, N W Marshall, C Van Ongeval et al\u00a0 Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test\u00a0 Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015) 3939-58\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/m.iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/60\/10\/3939\/pdf\/0031-9155_60_10_3939.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, R E van Engen, K C Young et al\u00a0 Average mean glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data\u00a0 Phys. Med. Biol. 60 (2015)\u00a0\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/article\/10.1088\/0031-9155\/60\/20\/7893\/meta\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, L M Warren, M G Wallis et al\u00a0 Breast Cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detector\u00a0 European Radiology (Accepted)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00330-015-3885-y#page-1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, L M Warren, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Development and validation of a modelling framework for simulating 2D-mammography and breast tomosynthesis images\u00a0 Phys. Med. Biol., 59 (15): 4275-4293 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/59\/15\/4275\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Shaheen, F De Keyzer, H Bosmans et al\u00a0 The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis\u00a0 Med. Phys. 41 (2014) 081913\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scitation.aip.org\/content\/aapm\/journal\/medphys\/41\/8\/10.1118\/1.4890590\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>\n\tD R Dance, K C Young\u00a0 Estimation of mean glandular dose for contrast enhanced digital mammography: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) 2127-37<\/em> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, R M Given-Wilson, M G Wallis et al The Effect of Image Processing on the Detection of Cancers in Digital Mammography\u00a0 American Journal of Roentgenology, 203(2): 387-393 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ajronline.org\/doi\/abs\/10.2214\/AJR.13.11812\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>O Diaz, D R Dance, K C Young et al\u00a0 Estimation of scattered radiation in digital breast tomosynthesis Phys. Med. Biol. 59 (2014) 4375-4390\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/59\/15\/4375\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, D R Dance, O Diaz, K C Young Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities (Medical Physics 12\/2014; 41(12):121901. DOI: 10.1118\/1.4900819)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scitation.aip.org\/content\/aapm\/journal\/medphys\/41\/12\/10.1118\/1.4900819\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Warren L M, Green F H, Shrestha L et al Validation of simulation of calcifications for observer studies in digital mammography. \nPhys. Med. Biol. 58 N217-N228 (2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/58\/16\/N217\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Fredenberg E, Dance D R, Willsher P et al Measurement of breast-tissue X-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: first results on cyst fluid. Phys. Med. Biol. 58 8609-8620 (2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/58\/24\/8609\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Bouwman R W, Diaz O, van Engen R E et al Phantoms for quality control procedures in digital breast tomosynthesis: dose assessment Phys. Med. Biol. 58 4423 (2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/58\/13\/4423\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Rashidnasab A, Elangovan P, Yip M et al Simulation and assessment of realistic breast lesions using fractal growth models. Phys. Med. Biol. 58 5613 (2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/58\/16\/5613\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Warren L M, Mackenzie A, Dance D R, Young K C Comparing the attenuation properties of calcifications to aluminium, hydroxyapatite and calcium oxalate. Phys. Med. Biol. 58 N103-N113 (2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/iopscience.iop.org\/0031-9155\/58\/7\/N103\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Mackenzie A, Dance D R, Yip M et al\u00a0 Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and X-ray system. Medical Physics 39 2721-34 (2012)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scitation.aip.org\/content\/aapm\/journal\/medphys\/39\/5\/10.1118\/1.4704525\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Warren L M, Mackenzie A, Cooke J et al\u00a0 Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. Medical Physics 39 3202-3213 (2012)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/scitation.aip.org\/content\/aapm\/journal\/medphys\/39\/6\/10.1118\/1.4718571\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>\n\tV Beral, M Alexander, S Duffy et al The number of women who would need to be screened regularly by mammography to prevent one death from breast cancer.\u00a0 Journal of Medical Screening 18 210-212 (2011)\n<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Dance D R, Young K C and Van Engen R E\u00a0 Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols Phys. Med. Biol. 56 453 (2011).<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M Yip, A Mackenzie, E Lewis,\u00a0et al.\u00a0 Image resampling effects in mammographic image simulation. Phys Med Biol 56 N275-286 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Shaheen, C Van Ongeval, F Zanca, et al.\u00a0 The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Medical Physics 38 6659-6671 (2011).<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Bouwman R, Young K C, Lazzari B,\u00a0et al\u00a0 An alternative method for noise analysis using pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems Phys. Med. Biol. 54 6809-6822 (2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Dance D R, Young K C and Van Engen R E\u00a0 Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols Phys. Med. Biol. 54 1-12 (2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Law J, Faulkner K and Young K C\u00a0 Risk factors for induction of breast cancer by x-rays and their implications for breast screening British Journal of Radiology 80 261-266 (2007)<\/em> - 2007<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P\u00f6yry P, Zanca F, Young K C,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten\/rhodium anode\/filter combination for an amorphous selenium based digital mammography system European Radiology 17 2368-2375 (2007)<\/em> - 2007<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Norman R, Evans D G R, Easton D F and Young K C\u00a0 The cost-utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers aged 30-49 European Journal of Health Economics, 8, 2 137-144 (2007)<\/em> - 2007<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C\u00a0 Recent developments in digital mammography Imaging 18 68-74 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M, Bosmans H et al\u00a0 Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography British Journal of Radiology 79 981-990 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Burch A and Oduko J M\u00a0 Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programme in 2001 and 2002 British Journal of Radiology 78 207-218 (2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Meeson S, Young K C, Wallis M G et al\u00a0 Image features of true positive and false negative cancers in screening mammograms British Journal of Radiology 76 13-21 (2003)<\/em> - 2003<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C\u00a0 Radiation doses in the United Kingdom trial of breast screening in women aged 40-48 years British Journal of Radiology 75 362-370 (2002)<\/em> - 2002<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Meeson S, Young K C, Ramsdale M L et al\u00a0Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film screen combinations British Journal of Radiology 74 825-835 (2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Meeson S, Young K C, Holloway P B and Wallis M G Procedure to assess automatic exposure control in mammography: a study of the GE Senographe 600T British Journal of Radiology 74 615-620 (2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Burch A\u00a0 Radiation doses received in the UK breast screening programme in 1997 and 1998 British Journal of Radiology 73 278-287 (2000)<\/em> - 2000<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Meeson S, Young K C and Cooke J Skin edge perception in mammograms: a comparison of two film screen combinations British Journal of Radiology 73 370-375 (2000)<\/em> - 2000<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, King S, Meeson S et al\u00a0 Auditing the image quality of mammograms Radiation Protection Dosimetry 90 279-282 (2000)<\/em> - 2000<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Dance D R, Skinner C L, Young K C\u00a0et\u00a0al\u00a0 Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol Phys. Med Biol. 45 3225-3240 (2000)<\/em> - 2000<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Meeson S, Young K C, Ramsdale M L, et al Analysis of optical density and contrast in mammograms British Journal of Radiology 72 670-677 (1999)\u00a0<\/em> - 1999<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A\u00a0 Auditing mammographic dose and image quality in the UK breast screening programme Radiation Protection Dosimetry 80 291-294 (1998)<\/em> - 1998<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Bignell F Review of dosimetric methods for mammography in the UK breast screening programme Radiation Protection Dosimetry 80 183-186 (1998)<\/em> - 1998<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Wallis M G, Blanks R and Moss S M\u00a0 Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on the detection of invasive cancers: results from the NHS Breast Screening Programme British Journal of Radiology 70 482-488 (1997)\u00a0<\/em> - 1997<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L, Rust A and Cooke J\u00a0 Effect of automatic kV selection on dose and contrast in mammography British Journal of Radiology 70 1036-1042 (1997)<\/em> - 1997<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A\u00a0 Dose and image quality with an automatic beam quality system British Journal of Radiology 69 555-562 (1996)<\/em> - 1996<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A\u00a0 Survey of mammographic image quality in the UK Radiation Protection Dosimetry 57 163-165 (1995)<\/em> - 1995<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C\u00a0 Comparison of dose measurement protocols in mammography Radiation Protection Dosimetry 57 401-403 (1995)<\/em> - 1995<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Wallis M G and Ramsdale M L\u00a0 Mammographic film density and detection of small breast cancers Clinical Radiology 49 461-465 (1994)<\/em> - 1994<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Ramsdale M L\u00a0 Evaluation of mammography image quality phantoms Radiation Protection Dosimetry 49 171-173 (1993)<\/em> - 1993<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Ramsdale M L\u00a0 Image quality and dose measurement phantoms in the UK Breast Screening Programme Radiation Protection Dosimetry 49 175-177 (1993)<\/em> - 1993<\/li><\/ul><h4><u>Conference Proceedings<\/u><\/h4><ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding: 0;\"><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, J Loveland, R van Engen\u00a0\u00a0Survey of image processing settings used for mammography systems in the United Kingdom: how variable is it?\u00a0\u00a017th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2024). SPIE, pp 232\u2013239 <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/13174\/1317410\/Survey-of-image-processing-settings-used-for-mammography-systems-in\/10.1117\/12.3026876.short#_=_\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Loveland, A Mackenzie\u00a0 Image quality in mammograms with low compressed breast thicknesses.\u00a0In: 17th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2024). SPIE, pp 219\u2013226\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/13174\/131740Y\/Image-quality-in-mammograms-with-low-compressed-breast-thicknesses\/10.1117\/12.3026474.short#_=_\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Worthy, A Mackenzie, N Smith, C Shenton-Taylor\u00a0 Creation of simulated mammography data to supplement machine learning training datasets.\u00a0 In: 17th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2024). SPIE, pp 284\u2013289\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/13174\/1317417\/Creation-of-simulated-mammography-data-to-supplement-machine-learning-training\/10.1117\/12.3025737.short#_=_\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2024<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Mackenzie A, Khan R, Young K\u00a0 Historical trends in image quality and mean glandular dose in digital mammography\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging 2020\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/115131G\/Historical-trends-in-image-quality-and-mean-glandular-dose-in\/10.1117\/12.2550568.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M L Hill, A Mackenzie, L M Warren, et al Mammographic image quality assessment by a contrast-to-noise ratio for clinical images\u00a0\u00a0Proc. SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI2020), 115130I (22 May 2020) <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/115130I\/Mammographic-image-quality-assessment-by-a-contrast-to-noise-ratio\/10.1117\/12.2564355.full\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Mackenzie A, Marshall N W, Baldelli P et al Methodology for undertaking quality control testing of ghosting in digital breast tomosynthesis systems\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging 2020\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/115132I\/Methodology-for-undertaking-quality-control-testing-of-ghosting-in-digital\/10.1117\/12.2564352.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Squires S, Ionescu G, Harkness E F et al\u00a0 Automatic density prediction in low dose mammography\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging 2020\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/115131D\/Automatic-density-prediction-in-low-dose-mammography\/10.1117\/12.2564714.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Stuffins M, Halling-Brown M, Mackenzie A\u00a0 The relationship between age of digital mammography systems and number of reported faults and downtime\u00a0 Proc. of SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging 2020\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/115131I\/The-relationship-between-age-of-digital-mammography-systems-and-number\/10.1117\/12.2560461.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Arana Pe\u00f1a, C Fedon,\u00a0 E Garc\u00eda et al\u00a0 Monte Carlo dose evaluation of different fibroglandular tissue distribution in breast imaging Proc. SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI2020), 115130G (22 May 2020)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/2564278\/Monte-Carlo-dose-evaluation-of-different-fibroglandular-tissue-distribution-in\/10.1117\/12.2564278.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>S Wells, P Elangovan, D R Dance et al. Modelling the use of stationary, rectangular arrays of x-ray emitters for digital breast tomosynthesis Proceedings Volume 11312, Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging; 113120R (2020)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11312\/113120R\/Modelling-the-use-of-stationary-rectangular-arrays-of-x-ray\/10.1117\/12.2548438.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, P Harris, S Gomes, M Trumble et al. Deep learning to calculate breast density from processed mammography images. Proc. SPIE 11513, 15th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI2020), 115131C (22 May 2020)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/11513\/115131C\/Deep-learning-to-calculate-breast-density-from-processed-mammography-images\/10.1117\/12.2561278.full\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2020<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, A Mackenzie, I Sechopoulos\u00a0 Validation of a method to simulate the acquisition of mammographic images with different techniques\u00a0 Proceedings Volume 10948, Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging; 109481K (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10948\/109481K\/Validation-of-a-method-to-simulate-the-acquisition-of-mammographic\/10.1117\/12.2513393.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Du-Crow, L M Warren, S M Astley, J Hulleman\u00a0 Is there a safety-net effect with computer-aided detection (CAD)? Proceedings Volume 10952, Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment; 109520J (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10952\/109520J\/Is-there-a-safety-net-effect-with-computer-aided-detection\/10.1117\/12.2512720.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Mackenzie, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Validation of modelling tools for simulating wide-angle DBT systems\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging; 10948; 109482E (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10948\/109482E\/Validation-of-modelling-tools-for-simulating-wide-angle-DBT-systems\/10.1117\/12.2512225.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>O Diaz, P Elangovan, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Can breast models be simplified to estimate scattered radiation in breast tomosynthesis? Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging; 10948: 109485J (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10948\/109485J\/Can-breast-models-be-simplified-to-estimate-scattered-radiation-in\/10.1117\/12.2512287.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, H L Dunn, J Boita et al\u00a0 A method to modify mammography images to appear as if acquired using different radiographic factors\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2019: Physics of Medical Imaging 10948; 109482F (2019) \n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10948\/109482F\/A-method-to-modify-mammography-images-to-a-appear-as\/10.1117\/12.2512419.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, M D Halling-Brown, L S Wilkinson et al Changes in Breast Density\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment; 109520W (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10952\/109520W\/Changes-in-breast-density\/10.1117\/12.2512252.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, E L Thomson, P Elangovan et al\u00a0 An observer study to assess the detection of calcification clusters using 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment; 109520U (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10952\/109520U\/An-observer-study-to-assess-the-detection-of-calcification-clusters\/10.1117\/12.2506895.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>W Murphy, P Elangovan, M Halling-Brown et al\u00a0 Using transfer learning for a deep learning model observer\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2019: Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment; 109520E (2019)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10952\/2511750\/Using-transfer-learning-for-a-deep-learning-model-observer\/10.1117\/12.2511750.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, A Mackenzie, I Sechopoulos\u00a0 Breast phantom validation of a mammographic image modification method\u00a0 14th Int. Work. Breast Imaging (IWBI 2018) 10718, E . A. Krupinski, Ed., 59, SPIE (2018).\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10718\/107180P\/Breast-phantom-validation-of-a-mammographic-image-modification-method\/10.1117\/12.2318367.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M D Halling-Brown, M N Patel, M G Wallis, K C Young Development of a national electronic interval cancer review for breast screening Medical Imaging 2018: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications; 105790E (2018)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10579\/105790E\/Development-of-a-national-electronic-interval-cancer-review-for-breast\/10.1117\/12.2293485.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M N Patel, K C Young, M D Halling-Brown Faster, efficient and secure collection of research images: the utilization of cloud technology to expand the OMI-DB\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2018: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications; 105791E (2018)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10579\/105791E\/Faster-efficient-and-secure-collection-of-research-images--the\/10.1117\/12.2295020.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D Petrov, N Marshall, K C Young, H Bosmans Model and human observer reproducibility for detecting microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis images\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2018: Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment; 105770B (2018)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10577\/105770B\/Model-and-human-observer-reproducibility-for-detecting-microcalcifications-in-digital\/10.1117\/12.2293311.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M Alnowami, G Mills, M Awis et al A deep learning model observer for use in alternative forced choice virtual clinical trials\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2018: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 105770Q (2018)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10577\/105770Q\/A-deep-learning-model-observer-for-use-in-alterative-forced\/10.1117\/12.2293209.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, E Mihalas, M Alnowami et al\u00a0 Design and validation of biologically inspired spiculated breast lesion models utilizing structural tissue distortion\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2018: Physics of Medical Imaging 10573, 105730B\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10573\/105730B\/Design-and-validation-of-biologically-inspired-spiculated-breast-lesion-models\/10.1117\/12.2293421.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, C Balta, D R Dance et al Independent images: a need for phantom based image quality assessment using model observers?\u00a0 14th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2018) 10718, 107181N\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10718\/107181N\/Independent-images--a-need-for-phantom-based-image-quality\/10.1117\/12.2317600.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, S Kaur, P Elangovan et al. Comparison of synthetic 2D images with planar and tomosynthesis imaging of the breast using a virtual clinical trial\u00a0 Medical Imaging 2018: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment vol 10577, ed R M Nishikawa and F W Samuelson (SPIE) p 16 (2018)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10577\/105770H\/Comparison-of-synthetic-2D-images-with-planar-and-tomosynthesis-imaging\/10.1117\/12.2293070.short\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M L Hill, N Khan, K Wang et al Validation of noise estimation for a clinical contrast-to-noise ratio for digital mammographic imaging Medical Imaging 2018: Physics of Medical Imaging vol 10573, ed G-H Chen, J Y Lo and T Gilat Schmidt (SPIE) p 199 (2018)\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10573\/105735D\/Validation-of-noise-estimation-for-a-clinical-contrast-to-noise\/10.1117\/12.2293866.short?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D Petrov, L Cockmartin, N Marshall et al. Real space channelization for generic DBT system image quality evaluation with channelized Hotelling observer. Proc. SPIE 10136, Medical Imaging 2017: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 101360N. \n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10136\/1\/Real-space-channelization-for-generic-DBT-system-image-quality-evaluation\/10.1117\/12.2254385.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, DR Dance, KC Young et al. Using non-specialist observers in 4AFC human observer studies. Proc. SPIE 10132, Medical Imaging 2017: Physics of Medical Imaging, 1013256. \n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spiedigitallibrary.org\/conference-proceedings-of-spie\/10132\/1\/Using-non-specialist-observers-in-4AFC-human-observer-studies\/10.1117\/12.2255560.pdf?SSO=1\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, KC Young, S Creten et al.\u00a0 Improving the Quality of Optimisation Studies Undertaken in Mammography and General Radiology Using High Level Blended Teaching.\u00a0 Springer International Publishing; 2016, p. 75-82. doi:10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_10. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_10\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>JM Oduko, KC Young Patient Dose Survey of Mammography Systems in the UK in 2013-2015\u00a0 IWDM 2016. LNCS 9699, pp. 1-8, (2016)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_41\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan et al. Effect of Dose on the Detection of Micro-Calcification Clusters for Planar and Tomosynthesis Imaging. \u00a0 IWDM 2016 2016;LNCS 9699:152-9. doi:10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_20.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_20\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Hadjipanteli, A Mackenzie et al.\u00a0 OPTIMAM Image Simulation Toolbox - Recent Developments and Ongoing Studies.\u00a0 IWDM 2016 2016;9699:668-75. doi:10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_83. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-41546-8_83\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D Petrov, K Michielsen, L Cockmartin et al.\u00a0 Development and application of a channelized Hotelling observer for DBT optimization on structured background test images with mass simulating targets. In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 24 (pp. 97871K-97871K). International Society for Optics and Photonics.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2507136\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>MN Patel, KC Young, MD Halling-Brown. Collection of sequential imaging events for research in breast cancer screening. In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 25 (pp. 97890K-97890K). International Society for Optics and Photonics. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2508824\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>LM Warren, MD Halling-Brown, PT Looney et al.\u00a0 Impact of two types of image processing on cancer detection in mammography.\u00a0 In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 24 (pp. 978704-978704). International Society for Optics and Photonics.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2507087\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, F Alrehily, RF Pinto et al. Simulation of spiculated breast lesions.\u00a0 In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 22 (pp. 97832E-97832E). International Society for Optics and Photonics.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2506564\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, DR Dance, KC Young, K Wells.\u00a0 Generation of 3D synthetic breast tissue.\u00a0 In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 22 (pp. 978308-978308). International Society for Optics and Photonics. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2506525\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, PT Looney et al.\u00a0 Detection of microcalcification clusters by 2D-mammography and narrow and wide angle digital breast tomosynthesis. In SPIE Medical Imaging 2016 Mar 22 (pp. 978306-978306). International Society for Optics and Photonics. \n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2506524\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Hadjipanteli, P Elangovan, PT Looney et al. Detection of Microcalcification Clusters in 2D-Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and the Relation to the Standard Method of Measuring Image Quality.\u00a0 January 2016 . XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016 . 01\/2016: pages 217-221; . ISBN: 978-3-319-32701-3.\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-32703-7_44\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Rashidnasab, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Performance comparison of breast imaging modalities using a 4AFC human observer study\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 94121T (March 18, 2015)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2210149\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J M Oduko, P Homolka, V Jones, D Whitwam\u00a0 Dose and image quality measurements for contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography systems Proc. of SPIE, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical ImaginVol.9412, 94125I-1\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2210333\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Fredenberg, K Erhard, K Berggren et al\u00a0 X-ray attenuation of adipose breast tissue: in-vitro and in-vivo measurements using spectral imaging\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 94121U (March 18, 2015)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2210150\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Rashidnasab, P Elangovan, A Mackenzie, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Virtual clincal trials using inserted pathology in clinical images: investigation of assumptions for local glandularity and noise\u00a0\u00a0Proc. SPIE 9412, Medical Imaging 2015: Physics of Medical Imaging, 94122D-94122D-7 (March 18, 2015)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2210165\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M N Patel, P T Looney, K C Young, M D Halling-Brown\u00a0 Quantitative imaging features: extension of the oncology medical image database\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 9418, Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations, 941812 (March 17, 2015)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2209793\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Looney, L M Warren, D R Dance, K C Young\u00a0 Sampling probability distributions of lesions in mammograms Proc. SPIE 9418, Medical Imaging 2015: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Next Generation and Innovations, 94180R-94180R-8 (March 17, 2015)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=2209784\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C J Strudley, K C Young Evaluation of a New Design of Contrast-Detail Phantom for Mammography: CDMAM Model 4.0. In Breast Imaging, 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, H. Fujita, T. Hara, and C. Muramatsu (Eds.): LNCS 8539, pp. 217-224, 2014 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag).<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-07887-8_31\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R E van Engen, H Bosmans, R W Bouwman et al\u00a0 A European Protocol for Technical Quality Control of Breast Tomosynthesis Systems\u00a0\u00a0 In Breast Imaging, 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, H.Fujita, T.Hara, and C. Muramatsu (Eds.): LNCS 8539, pp. 452-459, 2014 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-07887-8_63\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>\u00a0R\u00a0W Bouwman, R E van Engen, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Evaluation of Human Contrast Sensitivity Functions Used in the Nonprewhitening Model Observer with Eye Filter\u00a0 In Breast Imaging, 12th International Workshop, IWDM 2014, H. Fujita, T. Hara, and C. Muramatsu (Eds.): LNCS 8539, pp.715-722, 2014 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-319-07887-8_99\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M D Halling-Brown, M Patel, P Looney, K C Young\u00a0 Research database of oncology medial images\u00a0 International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 9 (2014) Supplement 1, S78-79<\/em> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M Patel, J Burnett, P Looney et al\u00a0 Automated collection of medical images for research\u00a0 International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 9 (2014) Supplement 1, S268-69<\/em> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P T Looney, K C Young, A Mackenzie and M D Halling-Brown\u00a0 MedXViewer: an extensible web-enabled software package for medical imaging\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 9037, Medical Imaging 2014: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 90371K (March 11, 2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1847449\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M N Patel, P Looney, K C Young and M D Halling-Brown\u00a0 Automated collection of medical images for research from heterogeneous systems: trials and tribulations\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 9039, Medical Imaging 2014: PACS and Imaging Informations: Next Generation and Innovations, 90390C (March 19, 2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1851996\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, L Dummott, M G Wallis et al Characterisation of screen-detected and simulated calcification clusters in digital mammograms IWDM, LNCS 8539, 364-371 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007%2F978-3-319-07887-8_51\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P T Looney, L M Warren, S M Astley et al Comparison of calcification cluster detection by CAD and human observer at different image quality levels\u00a0 IWDM, LNCS 8539, 643-649 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007%2F978-3-319-07887-8_89\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M D Halling-Brown, P Looney, M Patel et al Mammographic Image Database (MIDB) and associated web-enabled software for research IWDM, LNCS 8539, 514-519 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007%2F978-3-319-07887-8_72\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, L M Warren, D R Dance et al Using image simulation to test the effect of detector type on breast cancer detection\u00a0 SPIE Medical Imaging 9037, 903701 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/spie.org\/Publications\/Proceedings\/Paper\/10.1117\/12.2043423\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M Halling-Brown, P Looney, M Patel et al The oncology medical image database (OMI-DB)\u00a0\u00a0SPIE Medical Imaging 9039, 903906 (2014)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/spie.org\/Publications\/Proceedings\/Paper\/10.1117\/12.2041674\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J M Oduko, P Homolka, V Jones, D Whitwam\u00a0 A protocol for quality control testing for contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography systems IWDM 2014 LNCS 8539, 407-414 2014<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007%2F978-3-319-07887-8_57\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Fredenberg, D R Dance, P Willsher et al\u00a0 Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: First results on cyst fluid\u00a0 Proc. SPIE. 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging 866820<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1661955\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Rashidnasab, P Elangovan, A Mackenzie et al\u00a0 Simulation of 3D DLA masses in digital breast tomosynthesis\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics in Medical Imaging, 86680Y<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1669657\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, J Cooke, R Given-Wilson et al\u00a0 Effect of image processing on detection of non-calcification cancers in 2D digital mammography imaging SPIE Medical Imaging, Orlando, February 2013.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1673821\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, N M Marshall, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Characterisation of a breast tomosynthesis unit to simulate images\u00a0 Proc. SPIE. 8668, Medical Imaging 2013: Physics of Medical Imaging 86684R<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1662024\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C J Strudley, K C Young, J M Oduko et al\u00a0 Development of a quality control protocol for digital breast tomosynthesis systems in the TOMMY trial\u00a0 In: Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 330-337, 2012 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_43#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D R Dance, C J Strudley, K C Young et al Comparison of breast doses for digital tomosynthesis estimated from patient exposures and using PMMA breast phantoms\u00a0 In: Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 316-321, 2012 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_41#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J M Oduko and K C Young\u00a0 Long-term stability of image quality measurements for two digital mammography systems\u00a0 In: Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 212-219, 2012 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_28#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Rashidnasab, O Diaz et al A modelling framework for evaluation of 2d-mammography and breast tomosynthesis systems\u00a0 In: Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 338-345, 2012 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_44#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Rashidnasab, P Elangovan, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Modeling\u00a0realistic breast lesions using diffusion limited aggregation.\u00a0 Proc SPIE Medical Imaging (Volume 8313, 83134L) 2012<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1386471\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Rashidnasab, P Elangovan, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Realistic simulation of breast mass appearance using random walk.\u00a0 Proc SPIE Medical Imaging (Volume 8313, 83130L) 2012.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1386342\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, A Mackenzie, J Cooke et al\u00a0 Investigating the relationship between calcification cluster detection in digital mammography and threshold gold thickness measurements.\u00a0 In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging (Volume 8313, 83130J) 2012.<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1386340\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>O Diaz, D R Dance, K C Young et al\u00a0 A fast scatter field estimator for digital breast tomosynthesis.\u00a0 Proc SPIE Medical Imaging (Volume 8313, 831305-1-9) 2012<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org\/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1386326\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, D R Dance, O Diaz et al\u00a0 Converting one set of mammograms to simulate a range of detector imaging characteristics for observer studies.\u00a0 In Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 394-401 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag) 2012<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_51#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Shaheen, F Zanca, C van Ongeval et al. The morphology of microcalcifications in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: is it different?\u00a0 In: Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 362-368, 2012 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_47#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R W Bouwman, D R Dance, K C Young, et al Considerations for QC phantoms used for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis\u00a0 In: Breast Imaging, 11th International Workshop, IWDM 2012, ADA Maidment, PR Bakic and S Gavenonis (Eds), LNCS 7361, 322-329, 2012 (Berlin, Springer-Verlag)\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/chapter\/10.1007\/978-3-642-31271-7_42#\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, A Workman, D R Dance and K C Young\u00a0 Validation of a method to convert an image to appear as if acquired using a different digital detector. SPIE Medical Imaging, Buena Vista, Florida February 2011. Proc SPIE 79615Y-1 to 5Y-10 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Svalkvist, G Ullman, M H\u00c3\u00a5kansson,\u00a0et al. \u00a0Investigation of the effect of varying scatter-to-primary ratios on nodule contrast in chest tomosynthesis. SPIE Medical Imaging, Buena Vista, Florida February 2011. Proc SPIE 79614F-1 to F4-12 (2011).<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Diaz O, Yip M, Cabello J,\u00a0et al.\u00a0 Monte Carlo simulation of scatter field for calculation of contrast of discs in synthetic CDMAM images In: J. Mart\u00ed E A, editor. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 6136 628-635 (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Van Engen R E, Young K C, Bosmans H,\u00a0et al\u00a0 A supplement to the European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis In: J. Mart\u00c3\u00ac E A, editor. Proceedings of rnational Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 6136 643-650 (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C and Burch A\u00a0 A survey of patient doses from digital mammography systems in the UK in 2007 to 2009 In: J. Mart\u00c3\u00ac E A, editor. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 6136 365-370, (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Mackenzie A, Workman A, Dance D R,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Adapting clinical images to appear with different noise and sharpness to model a different detector In: J. Mart\u00ed E A, editor. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 6136 319-326 (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Yip M, Zanca F, Mackenzie A, et al\u00a0 Validation of a simulated dose reduction methodology using digital mammography CDMAM images and mastectomy images In: J. Mart\u00ed E A, editor. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 6136 78-85 (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Yip M, Chukwu W, Kottis E,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Automated scoring method for the CDMAM phantom In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging Volume 7263, 72631A 1-10\u00a0(2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Zanca F, Bosmans H, Jacobs J,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Contrast-Detail comparison between unprocessed and processed CDMAM images In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging Volume 7258, 72584Y 1-10 (2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Ravaglia V , Bouwman R, Young K,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Noise analysis of full field digital mammography systems In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging Volume 7258, 72581B 1-11 (2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Alsager A, Dance D R,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Predicting contrast detail performance from objective measurements in digital mammography In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging Volume 7258, 72581C 1-11 (2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C, Gundogdu O and Alsager A\u00a0 Effect of using tungsten-anode x-ray tubes on dose and image quality in full-field digital mammography In: Krupinski E A, editor. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 5116 522-529\u00a0(2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Van Engen R, Bouwman R, Van Der Burght R,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Image quality measurements in breast tomosynthesis\u00a0 In: Krupinski E A, editor. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 5116 696-702 (2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Alsager A, Oduko J M,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems. In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging 6913-47 1-11 (2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Alsager A, Young K C and Oduko JM\u00a0 Impact of heel effect and ROI size on the determination of contrast-to-noise ratio for digital mammography systems. In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging 6913-164 1-11 (2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Yip M, Young K C, Lewis E,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Validation of digital mammography image simulation chain with automated scoring of CDMAM images In: Krupinski E A, editor. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 5116 409-416 (2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M, Gundogdu O and Alsager A\u00a0 Comparing the performance of digital mammography systems In: Krupinski E A, editor. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 5116 732-739 (2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Bosmans H, Nijs K, Young K et al.\u00a0 First validation of a new phantom for global quality control in digital mammography In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging Volume 614612 1-13 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Cook J J H and Oduko J M\u00a0et al\u00a0Automated and Human Determination of Threshold Contrast for Digital Mammography Systems In:\u00a0 Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 4046 266-272 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Cook J J H and Oduko J M et al Use of the European Protocol to Optimise a Digital Mammography System In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, LNCS 4046 362-369 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Cook J J H, Oduko J M and Bosmans H\u00a0 Comparison of software and human observers in reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems In Proc SPIE Medical Imaging 2006 Volume 614206 1-13 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M and Bosmans H\u00a0 Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography 105-109 (2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Johnson B, Bosmans H and Van Engen R\u00a0 Development of minimum standards for image quality and dose in digital mammography Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Digital Mammography 149-154 (2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Kaplish A, Pretlove J R G, Young K C and Horton P W\u00a0 Investigation into the computer assessment of image quality in mammography In: Medical Imaging 1996: Image Processing, edited by Murray H. Loew, Kenneth M. Hanson, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 2710 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA) 979-987 (1996)<\/em> - 1996<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Alistair Mackenzie, John Loveland and Ruben van Engen\u00a0Survey of image processing settings used for mammography systems in the United Kingdom: how variable is it?\u00a0 Proc. SPIE 13174, 17th International Workshop on Breast Imaging (IWBI 2024) 10.1117\/12.3026876<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1117\/12.3026876\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - <\/li><\/ul><h4><u>Books &amp; Reports<\/u><\/h4><ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding: 0;\"><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie and C D Borrelli Under-estimation of uterine dose in medio-lateral oblique by Martins et al Radiography 28 572\u20133 Online: http:\/\/www.radiographyonline.com\/article\/S1078817422000116\/fulltext \u00a0\n<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.radiographyonline.com\/article\/S1078817422000116\/fulltext\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2022<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>DR Dance. Radiation Dose in X-ray Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Chapter in Handbook of X-ray Imaging: Physics and Technology, Ed P Russo, CRC Press pp575-593, 2017. <\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;id=rQZDDwAAQBAJ&#038;oi=fnd&#038;pg=PT121&#038;dq=Handbook+of+X-ray+Imaging:+Physics+and+TEchnology,+Ed+P+Russon,+CRC+Press&#038;ots=P82A8GpEfo&#038;sig=GiRdq9HWGS9hnzATvvjU6U8klKM#v=onepage&#038;q&#038;f=false\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>DR Dance, J-C Rosenwald, G Alm Carlsson. 2018 Interactions of uncharged particles with matter. Chapter in Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics Edition 2, Editors P Mayles, A Nahum, J-C Rosenwald. Taylor and Francis, in press, 2018. <\/em> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>DR Dance, IA Castellano. Patient dosimetry and dose. Chapter in: Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. (IAEA, Vienna) pp 551-588, 2014\n<\/em> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>JR Cunningham, DR Dance. Interaction of radiation with matter. Chapter in: Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students.(IAEA, Vienna) pp 11-33,2014\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/inis.iaea.org\/search\/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:46065919\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>K-H Ng, DR Dance. Fundamentals of atomic and nuclear physics. Chapter in: diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. (IAEA, Vienna) pp 1-10, 2014\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/inis.iaea.org\/search\/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:46065918\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>R E van Engen, H Bosmans, D R Dance et al\u00a0 Digital mammography update. European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening. S1, Part 1: Acceptance and constancy testing. In: European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition, Supplements. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, T\u00f6rnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (eds.). European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp. 1-54 (2013).<\/em> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>\u00a0R E van Engen, H Bosmans, P Heid et al\u00a0 Digital mammography update. European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening. S1, Part 2: Type testing\u00a0 In: European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition, Supplements. Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, T\u00f6rnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L (eds.). European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp. 55-71 (2013).<\/em> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>F J Gilbert, K C Young, S M Astley et al\u00a0 Digital Breast Tomosynthesis\u00a0\u00a0 NHSBSP Publication No 69. September 2010<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Dance D R\u00a0 Advances in X-ray mammography. In: Breast Cancer Ed. Michell M. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Van Engen R, Bosmans H,\u00a0et al\u00a0 Quality Control in Digital Mammography In Bick U and Diekmann F. Digital Mammography Ed. Springer: Heidelberg (2010)<\/em> - 2010<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Yaffe M, Chevalier M, Heggie J C,\u00a0et al\u00a0Quality Assurance Programme for Screen-film Mammography IAEA Human Health Series No 2: Vienna (December 2009)<\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C, Burch A,\u00a0et al\u00a0Review of Measurements on Full Field Digital Mammography Systems NHSBSP Equipment Report 0901 (January 2009) <\/em> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M and Young K C Audit of Physics services to the NHSBSP in 2007 NHSBSP Publication 67 (December 2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C, Burch A,\u00a0et al\u00a0Review of measurements on Full Field Digital Mammography Systems NHSBSP Equipment Report 0901 (January 2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Burch A, Castellano I, Kulama E, et al Commissioning and Routine Testing of Small Field Digital Mammography Systems. NHSBSP Report 0705 (May 2007)<\/em> - 2007<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Burch A, Whelehan P, Young K C and Cush S Routine quality control tests for full field digital mammography systems NHSBSP Equipment Report 0702 (February 2007)<\/em> - 2007<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Workman A, Castallano I, Kulama et al\u00a0Commissioning and routine testing of full field digital mammography systems NHSBSP Equipment Report 0604 (June 2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Van Engen R, Young K C, Bosmans H and Thijssen M\u00a0 The European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening In: European Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening, 4th Edition. Luxembourg: European Commission (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Kitou D \u00a0Review of Literature on Digital Mammography in Screening NHSBSP Equipment Report 0502 (December 2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Oduko J M Evaluation of Kodak DirectView Mammography Computerised Radiography NHSBSP Equipment Report 0504 (December 2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Moore A C, Dance D R, Evans D S et al\u00a0 The commissioning and routine testing of mammographic X-ray systems Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, IPEM Report No 89 (2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Oduko J M Review of Computerised Radiography Systems in the NHSBSP NHSBSP Equipment Report 0501 (April 2005)<\/em> - 2005<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Oduko J M Evaluation of the Kodak Min-R EV mammography film-screen system NHSBSP Equipment Report 0401 (July 2004)<\/em> - 2004<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C Report Breast Dose Surveys in the NHSBSP: Software And Instruction Manual Version 2.0 04\/July (2004) <\/em> - 2004<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Faulkner K, Wall B and Muirhead C Review of radiation risk in breast screening NHSBSP Publication No 54 (February 2003) <\/em> - 2003<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Van Engen R, Young K, Bosmans H and Thijssen M A O\u00a0 The European Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening: Addendum on Digital Mammography (Luxembourg, EC) (2003)<\/em> - 2003<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Schofield K An assessment of automatic beam quality selection by the Lorad M-IV X-ray set. NHSBSP Report 02\/01 (January 2002)<\/em> - 2002<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C Breast dose surveys in the NHSBSP: Software and instruction manual NHSBSP Report 01\/10 (October 2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Meeson S and Young K C Image feature of true positive and false negative cancers in screening mammograms NHSBSP Report 01\/07 (August 2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Dance D R and Moore A Guidance on beam quality selection in the NHS Breast Screening Programme NHSBSP Report 01\/06 (June 2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Lawinski C P, Young K C and Hancock C W A review of digital imaging in mammography and its application in the NHSBSP NHSBSP Report 01\/05 (June 2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C \u00a0Audit of physics services to the NHSBSP in 2001 NHSBSP Report 01\/03 (April 2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Thijssen M A O, Young K C and Woudenberg S Van\u00a0 The European Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening In &quot;European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening&quot; (Third edition Luxembourg, EC) (2001)<\/em> - 2001<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C\u00a0 Clinical experience with small field digital mammography systems NHSBSP Report 00\/2 (June 2000)<\/em> - 2000<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Ramsdale M Performance of mammographic equipment in the UK Breast screening programme in 2000\/2001 NHSBSP Publication No 56 (September 2000)<\/em> - 2000<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A\u00a0 Performance of mammographic equipment in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1998\/9 NHSBSP Publication No 45 (March 2000)<\/em> - 1998<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>National survey of mammographic image quality and dose in the UK Breast Screening Programme NHSBSP Publication No 37 (March 1998)<\/em> - 1998<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>National survey of mammographic image quality and dose in the UK Breast Screening Programme NHSBSP Publication No 37 (March 1998)<\/em> - 1998<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A The performance of mammographic equipment in the UK Breast Screening Programme in 1997 NHSBSP Publication No 41 (December 1997)<\/em> - 1997<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Thijssen M A O, Young K C and Wodenberg S van\u00a0 The European Protocol for the Quality Control of the Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening In &quot;European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Mammography Screening&quot; (Luxembourg, EC) (1996)<\/em> - 1996<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A Mammographic dose and image quality in the UK Breast Screening Programme NHSBSP Publication No 35 (March 1995)<\/em> - 1995<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Horton PW December\u00a0 Review of mammography equipment and its performance NHSBSP Publication No 24 (1992)<\/em> - 1992<\/li><\/ul><h4><u>Abstracts<\/u><\/h4><ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding: 0;\"><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C Fedon, M Hill, H Bosmans et al\u00a0 2019 Validation of volumetric breast density software using a 3D printed single-material breast phantom ECR 2019 Electronic Posters, EPOS, DOI: 10.26044\/ecr2019\/C-2270\n<\/em> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C Fedon, R van Engen, J Binst et al 2019 Proposal of a breast phantom for dosimetry quality control procedures in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis  ECR 2019 book of abstracts: Insights in Imaging paper B1839\n<\/em> - 2019<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J Boita, A Mackenzie, R van Engen et al. Development of algorithms to degrade the image quality of mammograms for lesion detectability studies.\u00a0 ECR 2018 B-0550 (2018).\n<\/em> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M L Hill, N Khan, K Wang et al Contrast-to-Noise Ratio for Clinical Mammographic Images\u00a0 RSNA 2017 SSQ18-03 (2017)\n<\/em> - 2017<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A Mackenzie, LM Warren, M Patel et al. PB.20 Characterisation of cancers from digital mammograms from a large scale database: size, conspicuity and appearance.\u00a0 Breast Cancer Research Vol 18 Supplement 1.\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s13058-016-0766-5\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2016<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>E Fredenberg, DR Dance, KC Young et al. X-ray Attenuation of Normal and Cancerous Breast Tissue Measured with Photon-counting Spectral Imaging. RSNA Annual Meeting 2015\n<\/em> - 2015<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Elangovan, A Rashidnasab, A Mackenzie et al.\u00a0 A 4AFC Observer Study to Compare the Visibility of Masses in 2D-mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Systems. RSNA Annual Meeting 2014.\n<\/em> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>M Patel, P Looney, K Young and M Halling-Brown\u00a0 A National Digital Mammography Image Database and Associated Observer Study Software\u00a0 In Symposium Mammographicum 2014 Meeting Abstracts (London, British Institute of Radiology) abstract P44, page 26<\/em> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L Warren, L Dummott, M Wallis et al How do the results of virtual clinical trials using simulated cancers relate to cancer detection in screening\u00a0 British Journal of Radiology 2014 abstract P48, page 26<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1259\/conf-symp.2014\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P Looney, L Warren, S Astley et al Comparison of calcification cluster detection by CAD and human observers at different image quality level\u00a0 British Journal of Radiology 2014 abstract P46, page 26<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.birpublications.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1259\/conf-symp.2014\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2014<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L Warren, A Mackenzie, J Cooke et al Does digital mammography detector type and dose level affect calcification detection? European Congress of Radiology March, 2012<\/em> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, A Mackenzie, J Cooke et al\u00a0 The effect of change in image quality on cancer detection in digital mammography. British Journal of Radiology 2012 abstract P15, page 13\n&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/bjr.birjournals.org\/site\/misc\/SympMamm_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>P T Looney, M Halling-Brown, R Given-Wilson et al\u00a0 A national digital mammography image resource. British Journal of Radiology 2012 abstract P29, page 19&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/bjr.birjournals.org\/site\/misc\/SympMamm_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>J M Oduko, E H L Mungutroy, M Bowron Automating the collection of data for patient dose surveys. British Journal of Radiology 2012 page 2&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/bjr.birjournals.org\/site\/misc\/SympMamm_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>\n\tC J Strudley, P T Looney, K C Young, F J Gilbert Technical performance of the seven Hologic Dimensions tomosynthesis systems used in the TOMMY trial. British Journal of Radiology 2012 abstract P19, page 15<\/em> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C J Strudley, J M Oduko, P T Looney et al Physics tomosynthesis quality control tests for the TOMMY trial. British Journal of Radiology 2012 abstract P22, page 14&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/bjr.birjournals.org\/site\/misc\/SympMamm_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>\n\tC J Strudley, J M Oduko, A Barnard et al Radiographer tomosynthesis quality control tests for the TOMMY trial. British Journal of Radiology 2012 abstract P22, page 16\n&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/bjr.birjounals.org\/site\/misc\/SympMammo_2012.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>D R Dance, K C Young and R E van Engen\u00a0 Proposed European protocol for the estimation of average glandular dose for digital breast tomosynthesis. European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, 2011. Insights into Imaging (ECR Book of Abstracts), Vol 2 (Suppl. 1) S161 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L Warren, A Mackenzie, J Cooke et al\u00a0 Dependence of detectability of micro-calcification clusters on quality of mammography images, RCR breast group meeting. Breast Cancer Research 2011, 13(Suppl 1):P23<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>F J Gilbert, M G C Gillan, M J Michell et al\u00a0 TOMMY Trial (a comparison of tomosynthesis with digital mammography in the UK NHS breast screening programme) setting up a multicentre imaging trial. Breast Cancer Research 2011, 13(Suppl 1):P28<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, A Mackenzie, J Cooke, et al\u00a0 Dependence of detectability of micro-calcification clusters on quality of mammography images. Royal College of Radiologists Breast Group Meeting, Glasgow, November 2012. Breast Cancer Research 2011, Volume 13 Suppl 1 S7-S8 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L Warren, A Mackenzie, D R Dance, et al.\u00a0 Observer study to investigate the detection of micro-calcification clusters in digital mammography images of different image quality. Proceedings of the UK Radiological Congress, Manchester June 2011 p13 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>L M Warren, F H Green, L Shrestha, et al.\u00a0 Validation of the insertion of micro-calcification clusters into mammographic images for observer studies. European Medical Physics and Engineering Conference, Dublin, EMPEC 2011 Abstracts Book paper 91 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>A. Jacobs, L. Cockmartin, D. R. Dance, H. Bosmans\u00a0 Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: comparison of different methods to calculate patient doses. European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, 2011. Published on-line as electronic poster C2220 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>K Young, L Warren, D Dance, et al.\u00a0 Are the image quality standards in the EU mammography guidelines relevant to clinical performance? European Medical Physics and Engineering Conference, Dublin, EMPEC 2011 Abstracts Book paper 143 (2011)<\/em> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C\u00a0 Full field digital mammography: which equipment? Breast Cancer Res 10 (Suppl 3) :P33 (doi: 10.1186\/bcr2031) (2008)<\/em> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C and Cook J J H\u00a0 Image quality and dose for digital mammography systems European Congress of Radiology, Book of Abstracts, European Radiology, Supplement 1, Volume 16 336 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M and Bosmans H\u00a0 Optimisation of digital mammography systems European Congress of Radiology, Book of abstracts, European Radiology, Supplement 1,Volume 16 255 (2006)<\/em> - 2006<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Bosmans H, Rogge F, Carton A K et al\u00a0 Practical experience with the application of the &quot;Digital addendum of the European protocol for quality assurance in mammography&quot; European Radiology 14 Supplement 2:516 (abstract) (2004)<\/em> - 2004<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Thijssen M A O, Van Engen R, Bosmans H and Young K C\u00a0 The digital addendum to the European Protocol for QC in mammography screening European Radiology 14: Supplement 2: 134 (abstract) (2004)<\/em> - 2004<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Johnson B P, Young K C and Bosmans H\u00a0 Image quality and dose in digital mammography In Proceedings of UK Radiological Congress 2003 (British Institute of Radiology, London) (2003)<\/em> - 2003<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Wallis M G, Young K C, Blanks R and Moss S M\u00a0 Influence of number of views and mammographic film density on cancer detection rates in breast screening Journal of Medical Screening, 4, 4 (1997)<\/em> - 1997<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Ramsdale M L and Rust A\u00a0 Image quality variations in the UK NHS breast screening programme Journal of Medical Screening, 4, 5 (1997)<\/em> - 1997<\/li><\/ul><h4><u>Technical Evaluations<\/u><\/h4><ul style=\"list-style-type: none; padding: 0;\"><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>C J Strudley, L M Warren, K C Young. Technical evaluation of EIZO RadiForce RX850 8MP monitor.\u00a0 NCCPM Technical Report 1801, June 2018.\n<\/em> <a href=\"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/files\/other\/Tech_Eval_Eizo_for_website.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2018<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Strudley C J, Young K C, Oduko J M\u00a0 Technical evaluation of the IMS Giotto 3DL Digital Breast Imaging System\u00a0 NHSBSP Equipment Report 1301<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1301.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C, Warren L M\u00a0 Technical evaluation of the Fuji Amulet f\/s Digital Breast Imaging System NHSBSP Equipment Report 1304 (May 2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1304.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Oduko J M, Young K C\u00a0 Technical evaluation of Philips MicroDose L30 with AEC software version 8.3\u00a0 NHSBSP equipment report 1305 (October 2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1305.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Strudley C J, Warren L M, Young K C\u00a0 Technical evaluation of Siemens Mammomat Inspiration digital breast tomosynthesis system NHSBSP Equipment Report 1306 (October 2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1306.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Strudley C J, Looney P, Young K C Technical evaluation of Hologic Selenia Dimensions digital breast tomosynthesis system\u00a0 NHSBSP Equipment Report 1307 (October 2013)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1307.html\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2013<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M\u00a0 Technical evaluation of Hologic Selenia Dimensions 2-D Digital Breast Imaging System with software version\u00a01.4.2\u00a0\u00a0 NHSBSP Equipment Report 1201 (July 2012)<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1201.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2012<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M, Warren L M\u00a0 Technical evaluation of Hologic Selenia Dimensions 2-D digital breast imaging system\u00a0\u00a0 NHSBSP Equipment Report 1101 (February 2011) <\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-1101.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2011<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M, Gundogdu O and Alsager A Technical Evaluation of Siemens Mammomat Inspiration of full Field Digital Mammography System NHSBSP Equipment Report 0909 (December 2009 )&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0909.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M and Asad M Technical Evaluation of Agfa DX-M Mammography CR Reader with HM5.0 Needle-IP NHSBSP Equipment Report 0905 (November 2009)&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0905.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M and Asad M Technical Evaluation of Fuji Amulet Full Field Digital Mammography System NHSBSP Equipment Report 0907 (November 2009)&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0907.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M, Gundogdu O and Asad M Technical Evaluation of Profile Automatic Exposure Control Software on GE Essential Full Field Digital Mammography Systems NHSBSP Equipment Report 0903 (May 2009)&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0903.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2009<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M, Gundogdu O and Alsager A Technical Evaluation of the Konica Minolta Regius 190 CR Mammography System NHSBSP Equipment Report 0806 (December 2008)&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0806.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C, Oduko J M and Alsager A Technical Evaluation of the Sectra MDM-L30 Full Field Digital Mammography System NHSBSP Equipment Report 0805 (November 2008)&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/nhsbsp-equipment-report-0805.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2008<\/li><li style=\"margin-bottom: 1em;\">\u25d8 <em>Young K C and Oduko J M Technical evaluation of a new version of the Fuji AD mammography film-screen system NHSBSP Equipment Report 0402 (February 2004)&#039;<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk\/breastscreen\/publications\/me-egn-01.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">(link)<\/a> - 2004<\/li><\/ul><\/div><br>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":6,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"home-page.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"saved_in_kubio":true,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-231","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"kubio_ai_page_context":{"short_desc":"","purpose":"general"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=231"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/231\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1613,"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/231\/revisions\/1613"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medphys.royalsurrey.nhs.uk\/nccpm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}